Knowledge Representation and Reasoning *  COMP4418

Is COMP4418 a course? Does COMP4418 deserve to be a course?

One of the worst CSE courses, 3 lectures with different teaching style teaching 3 irrelevent sections. The last lecture Haris Aziz only covered definitions during the lecture but gave assignments on some unsolvable algorithm design problems. I have to say that unless you want to waste both your time and your money, please stay away from this course.

理论很丰富，实际应用差的可怜。 

垃圾课。屁用没有。

据说自从院长接管了此课。。。此课就没什么选择的价值了。。。据说很多人是为了凑星号课选的这门破课。一门课每4周一个老师开一个全新的chapter，彼此之间毫无关联，每年据说一个教研室抽签决定谁来讲课，讲课的人就讲自己负责研究的领域。。。这就导致hummm每个部分授课的水平参差不齐。。。尤其18S2的Aziz讲博弈论口音奇葩，上课讲的逻辑混乱，ppt例子又少又没有什么代表性。。。加上院长大人ass1的神奇批分。。。分数极为惨烈。。。。奉劝各位能不选千万不要选，因为感觉即便是单看内容，实用性也不强。

4418，两年中唯一一门有意识地选的水课（就我自己而言），这门课是AI方向的基础课。学的知识很理论，一共要求交三个作业，不用期中和期末考试，每个作业占总分的1/3，第二个作业有一个小编程题用的是ASP，跟着MessageBoard上老师给的提示就可以写出来了。

作者：陈迪威
链接：https://www.zhihu.com/question/24357695/answer/132740090 
来源：知乎
著作权归作者所有，转载请联系作者获得授权。

FromDan's Comp electives

- Excellent follow-up to AI. Goes over First Order logic, Prolog, and similar things. A lot of theory, but good stuff for higher-level AI. The constraint programming and general game playing is pretty cool
- Basically 3 assignments and nothing else. Which is cool, I guess? Would prefer to actually have labs where you get feedback. Content is interesting. Whoever called it an unfun clusterfuck was exaggerating a bit.